1,123 results for 'cat:"Employment Retaliation"'.
J. Neeley finds the county court properly granted the dept's. plea to the jurisdiction. The female African American former employee filed suit after being denied employment for a position from which she had resigned. She was eventually rehired and filed civil rights charges with the Texas Workforce Commission, alleging she was retaliated against, and that the dept. did not comply with a settlement agreement. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the negligence claim does not fall within the tort claims act's limited waiver of immunity, the state is immune from the claim for breach of the settlement agreement, no prima facie claim for retaliation was stated, and the state is not the employer pursuant to the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Neeley , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00204-CV, Categories: Jurisdiction, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Neeley finds the county court properly granted the dept's. plea to the jurisdiction. The female African American former employee filed suit after being denied employment for a position from which she had resigned. She was eventually rehired and filed civil rights charges with the Texas Workforce Commission, alleging she was retaliated against, and that the dept. did not comply with a settlement agreement. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the negligence claim does not fall within the tort claims act's limited waiver of immunity, the state is immune from the claim for breach of the settlement agreement, no prima facie claim for retaliation was stated, and the state is not the employer pursuant to the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Neeley , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00204-CV, Categories: Jurisdiction, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Rabner finds that the appellate division improperly held that a police officer violated the non-disparagement clause in her settlement with the township by stating in a television news interview that she had been abused for eight years and discussing allegedly retaliatory disciplinary charges because the non-disparagement clause would bar speech protected under state anti-discrimination laws, and thus was not enforceable. Further, "survivors of discrimination and harassment have the right to speak about their experiences in any number of ways, and they can no longer be restrained by confidentiality provisions in employment contracts or settlement agreements." Reversed in part.
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court, Judge: Rabner , Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: A-2-23, Categories: Employment, Defamation, employment Retaliation
J. Sessions denies a construction and excavation business, and its board members motion to dismiss in this Fair Labor Standards Act dispute brought by the Department of Labor alleging unlawful retaliation against employees that received back wages from a settlement. The employees alleges that the board members made false and retaliatory statements on the social media platform Facebook. The DoL plausibly alleged the conduct was a retaliation threat based on coercion making it plausibly unprotected. Discovery may proceed and the Labor Department’s motion to amend is also denied.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Sessions, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv560, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment Retaliation, Labor
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Moon grants the city's motion for summary judgment in an employment discrimination suit. A female firefighter sued the city, claiming she experienced discriminatory treatment from her superiors and that her superiors opened a retaliatory investigation into her conduct, resulting in her demotion. There is no evidence of her employers treating male coworkers differently; they, too, are required to provide a doctor's note if taking sick leave, and there is no evidence of them making statements about women not belonging in the fire service. A feeling of disrespect is not a substitute for evidence of discriminatory treatment.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Moon, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 6:23cv32, Categories: Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Newman grants the police department's motion for summary judgment, ruling the police officer's age discrimination claim fails. The younger officer used as a comparator did not commit the same type of misconduct and, therefore, is not similarly situated, while a supervisor's single comment about "younger officers" during disciplinary proceedings does not constitute direct evidence of discrimination. Meanwhile, the retaliation claim also fails as a matter of law because the fitness for duty evaluation required before the officer could return to work was not an "adverse employment action," especially considering the officer blamed several mistakes that led to his suspension on the stress of his job.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Newman, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv96, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Richardson grants the defendant company’s motion for summary judgment in this case brought by a former employee asserting certain state-law employment related claims, including retaliatory discharge under the Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Law and discriminatory discharge under the Tennessee Disability Act. As to the former employee’s two claims, which both stem from his termination, the court concludes that there are no issues of fact and that the employer is “entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Richardson, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv87, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: Employment, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Chun declines to dismiss the school faculty member's retaliation claim in his complaint alleging that the university president wrongfully fired the faculty member for putting a statement in his class syllabus, emails and outside his faculty office door about the Coast Salish tribe's claim to land that read, "I acknowledge that by the labor theory of property the Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington." The school faculty member plausibly alleges a First Amendment retaliation claim as his speech “related to scholarship or teaching." While the university and its president cite the "Johnson v. Poway Unified School District" decision that allows discipline of speech on school grounds, that case's analysis focuses on secondary school education, not college education.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv964, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Education, employment Retaliation, First Amendment
J. AliKhan largely grants the employer's motion for summary judgment and denies the employee's cross-motion for partial summary judgment in her suit alleging that the employer failed to accommodate her disabilities and cut her hours and threatened to terminate her for taking medical leave. Summary judgment is denied to the employer as to claims related to failures to provide an ergonomic chair and desk and related to the employer's requirement that the employee recertify her FMLA leave. It is otherwise granted.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: AliKhan, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 1:19cv1766, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Garcia denies all parties' motions for summary judgment, ruling the bus drivers' cited evidence fails to establish all necessary elements for their retaliation and discrimination claims and, therefore, precludes judgment in their favor. Meanwhile, the drivers' claims regarding the employer's failure to properly sanitize buses or use hypoallergenic sanitizers in the wake of Covid-19 are not preempted by the National Transit Systems Security Act because the complaint filed with OSHA before this suit was filed was dismissed by the agency.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Garcia, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv217, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Evidence, Preemption, employment Retaliation
J. Saylor denies in part several funds and their chairman’s motion for summary judgment against their former administrator who is being sued for breach of fiduciary duty and has asserted counterclaims for sexual harassment, creating a hostile work environment, retaliation for reporting harassment and failure to accommodate her Type 1 diabetes. The chairman repeatedly behaved inappropriately and made sexual comments to the administrator, such as telling her that he wanted her and had a crush on her and that his wife wasn’t taking care of him, attempting to kiss her against her will immediately after screaming and swearing at her after she gave told him his behavior made her uncomfortable, and if the breasts of an employee on medical leave for breast cancer were “any good.”
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Saylor, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv10163, NOS: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) - Labor, Categories: Employment, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Robbenhaar grants the city's motion for summary judgment, ruling that because the contract and due process claims brought by the police officer are identical to the ones litigated in disciplinary and administrative proceedings immediately after his termination, they are barred by res judicata.
Court: USDC New Mexico, Judge: Robbenhaar, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv1113, NOS: Labor/Management Relations - Labor, Categories: Civil Procedure, Government, employment Retaliation
J. Fischer finds that the lower court properly declined to set aside a default judgment against the employer in a case filed by a worker alleging he was discriminated against for filing a workers' compensation claim following a fall that injured his back. The employer failed to prove good cause for its default and defaulted claims asserting the court wrongly awarded punitive damages. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Supreme Court, Judge: Fischer, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: SC100193, Categories: employment Retaliation, Workers' Compensation
J. Bennett grants the commission’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former employee alleging wrongful termination and retaliation after she complained that an external speaker used the word “negro” during a presentation. She claims retaliation in violation of the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act and Title VII, but fails to plausibly allege she was engaged in a protected activity or an adverse action. The court finds she cannot cure her defects by amending her complaint. Therefore, the clerk shall close this case and it is dismissed with prejudice.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2492, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, employment Retaliation
J. Hollander grants the university’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former Black assistant professor alleging retaliation, race discrimination and hostile work environment claims. Her teaching contract was not renewed after making a complaint to human resources regarding a supervisor directing her to work five days a week, but she could not because of a daycare situation. She fails to include allegations related to the retaliation claims, making it inconsistent with the discrimination claims for the exhaustion requirement.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Hollander, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2272, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Kirsch finds that the lower court properly found for the city on a female employee's gender discrimination claims. The employee does not identify adequate male comparators to support her equal pay and sex discrimination allegations, nor does she show that she engaged in protective activity to support a retaliation claim. Rather, the city presents a reasonable explanation for believing her performance inadequate in support of its decision to fire her. Affirmed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Kirsch, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 23-1761, Categories: Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Mehalchick denies a borough’s motion to dismiss an age and disability discrimination claim brought by a former police officer who says he was forced to retire. The former police officer’s allegations were plausible because he was over 40, qualified for his job, hearing-impaired and replaced by a younger employee.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Mehalchick, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv912, NOS: Civil Rights - Habeas Corpus, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Rowland partially grants a health care analytics company’s motion for summary judgment on one of its former employees’ discrimination claims. The former employee says the company refused to accommodate her depression, anxiety and Sjögren’s Syndrome, then fired her in retaliation for taking FMLA leave. The court finds the former employee has sufficiently alleged her disability discrimination, failure to accommodate and retaliation claims, but grants the company judgment on her FMLA interference claim. The court also denies the company’s motion for sanctions.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Rowland, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv1612, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities-Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Bennett grants Sherwin-Williams’ motion to compel arbitration and stay of the proceedings in this employment dispute brought by a former paint mixer who alleges race discrimination based on a failure to rehire claim. The paint mixer argues that the arbitration agreement was outside of the scope of his claims and not valid. The court found the arbitration agreement to be valid and enforceable, delegating the threshold issue of arbitrability to the arbitrator.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3190, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Arbitration, Employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Seabright refuses to dismiss part of a fired employee’s complaint against state deputy attorneys general for informing his Japanese employer about his previous litigation history. One of these attorneys general does not have qualified immunity as there is evidence of the deputy attorney general contacting his former employer. There is also evidence of malice and that she would have known about the employee’s employment contract at the Japanese company. Emotional distress claims are dismissed, however, as the act was not “outrageous.”
Court: USDC Hawaii, Judge: Seabright, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv359, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Government, Interference With Contract, employment Retaliation